Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Are Iraq War Veterans supported by Peacemakers?
I read a front page article about an Iraq war veteran, and then the badmouthing of him and our country by a leftist in Kansas City. Of course she speaks for the Tuesday Night Cut-n-Runners (the so-called Peacemakers) we hear from so much here in Sheridan, Wy.
A veteran told me that the thing that bothered him the most was coming back from the war and seeing the demonstrators on main street.
These people, most of whom are old hippies who fried their brains long ago with drugs, have always hated the military. Look at the Clintons. Ol' Slick Willie, and his Democrat Congress, they cut way back on funding and other things our troops need. After we were attacked on 9/11, G.W. Bush had a real job on his hands getting our war machine back on it's feet.
I tried to find a way to join our troops in Afghanistan, and help establish justice on the people who attacked us. It wasn't possible, but I have been very supportive of the ones who risk their lives for our way of life. And, that goes for all veterans.
They give their all, so we can have freedom, and the so-called "Peacemakers" take advantage of that freedom to make fools of themselves. These are the kind of people who will vote for either Billery or B. Hussein Obama, because they promise more handouts for loafers, and want to force our soldiers to cut and run. Just like what happened to our brave soldiers in Viet Nam.
Look what happened there: Viet Nam is now Communist, and that is what we were trying to prevent. The leftists in this country are happy with that though.
This Jennifer Knight, who doesn't even live in Sheridan, says: "we are in Iraq for one brutal reason--cheap oil". I have heard that asinine comment before. I want to know where this "cheap oil" is. Is 120 dollar a barrel oil cheap? The president must be hiding the "cheap oil" in the basement of the White House. And Bigfoot is guarding it.
I have talked to all the Iraq War soldiers I could. They have all told me that the people of Iraq appreciate us liberating them from a tyrant. I talked to an Iraqi man in Bangkok a couple years ago who told me the exact same thing. Freedom is a new experience for them, and they like it.
They were very proud of being able to vote. Most Americans don't even bother to get off the couch to do that. Our freedom is taken for granted, and we may lose it someday for that.
I wish more was done for the troops who fight for our country. I want them to know that there are many who may not say so publicly, but we really appreciate what they do for us.
A veteran told me that the thing that bothered him the most was coming back from the war and seeing the demonstrators on main street.
These people, most of whom are old hippies who fried their brains long ago with drugs, have always hated the military. Look at the Clintons. Ol' Slick Willie, and his Democrat Congress, they cut way back on funding and other things our troops need. After we were attacked on 9/11, G.W. Bush had a real job on his hands getting our war machine back on it's feet.
I tried to find a way to join our troops in Afghanistan, and help establish justice on the people who attacked us. It wasn't possible, but I have been very supportive of the ones who risk their lives for our way of life. And, that goes for all veterans.
They give their all, so we can have freedom, and the so-called "Peacemakers" take advantage of that freedom to make fools of themselves. These are the kind of people who will vote for either Billery or B. Hussein Obama, because they promise more handouts for loafers, and want to force our soldiers to cut and run. Just like what happened to our brave soldiers in Viet Nam.
Look what happened there: Viet Nam is now Communist, and that is what we were trying to prevent. The leftists in this country are happy with that though.
This Jennifer Knight, who doesn't even live in Sheridan, says: "we are in Iraq for one brutal reason--cheap oil". I have heard that asinine comment before. I want to know where this "cheap oil" is. Is 120 dollar a barrel oil cheap? The president must be hiding the "cheap oil" in the basement of the White House. And Bigfoot is guarding it.
I have talked to all the Iraq War soldiers I could. They have all told me that the people of Iraq appreciate us liberating them from a tyrant. I talked to an Iraqi man in Bangkok a couple years ago who told me the exact same thing. Freedom is a new experience for them, and they like it.
They were very proud of being able to vote. Most Americans don't even bother to get off the couch to do that. Our freedom is taken for granted, and we may lose it someday for that.
I wish more was done for the troops who fight for our country. I want them to know that there are many who may not say so publicly, but we really appreciate what they do for us.
Monday, May 5, 2008
Does Bank of America donate money to anti-gun organizations?
Not long ago I read an editorial that someone wrote, saying that when using a Bank Of America credit card, a portion of the money is donated to leftist anti-gun rights organizations. I have been trying to verify that, and can find nothing of the sort.
I am a member of the NRA-of course, and a member of the Second Amendment Foundation. I got a credit card through the latter. Every time I use it, a portion of the money goes to the Second Amendment Foundation. They fight for our constitutional gun rights.
If not for these pro-gun rights organizations, the liberal Democrats would have taken away our gun rights long ago (while the Republicans let it happen). And, of course, that would help the criminals commit more crimes, which means more laws against our freedom. It never ends.
In any state where the gun control laws are relaxed, and people can get right to carry permits, the crime is decreased. That is a known fact, which is not reported by the liberal media. That wouldn't fit their agenda.
What is a shame, is that so many gun owners don't bother to join an organization like the National Rifle Association. They leave the burden on backs of a few. It is easy to find the NRA, and others, on the internet.
So, someone can try to prove me wrong on this, but in the meantime I will continue to use my Bank of America credit card. Only verifiable facts can change my mind.
I am a member of the NRA-of course, and a member of the Second Amendment Foundation. I got a credit card through the latter. Every time I use it, a portion of the money goes to the Second Amendment Foundation. They fight for our constitutional gun rights.
If not for these pro-gun rights organizations, the liberal Democrats would have taken away our gun rights long ago (while the Republicans let it happen). And, of course, that would help the criminals commit more crimes, which means more laws against our freedom. It never ends.
In any state where the gun control laws are relaxed, and people can get right to carry permits, the crime is decreased. That is a known fact, which is not reported by the liberal media. That wouldn't fit their agenda.
What is a shame, is that so many gun owners don't bother to join an organization like the National Rifle Association. They leave the burden on backs of a few. It is easy to find the NRA, and others, on the internet.
So, someone can try to prove me wrong on this, but in the meantime I will continue to use my Bank of America credit card. Only verifiable facts can change my mind.
Sunday, May 4, 2008
ABC News Clinton/Obama Debate
I hear that the Liberal Democrats have been screaming and gnashing their teeth about the Clinton/Obama debate. They think moderators: Charley Gibson and George Stephenapoulus asked too hard questions of the candidates.
Clinton was asked about her lies about ducking sniper fire, and Obama was asked about his refusal to wear even the flag lapel pin given to him by a veteran. The poor babies had to stammer and try to change the subject.
I have a little higher opinion of ABC now. They are still a liberal media, but at least maybe they are a little less liberal/leftist than the rest.
I can't imagine why anyone would want to vote for either Billery, or B. Hussein Obama. It would either be their infatuation with a black president and a woman president, or it must be self-induced ignorance.
Maybe ABC helped stop some of that ignorance.
Clinton was asked about her lies about ducking sniper fire, and Obama was asked about his refusal to wear even the flag lapel pin given to him by a veteran. The poor babies had to stammer and try to change the subject.
I have a little higher opinion of ABC now. They are still a liberal media, but at least maybe they are a little less liberal/leftist than the rest.
I can't imagine why anyone would want to vote for either Billery, or B. Hussein Obama. It would either be their infatuation with a black president and a woman president, or it must be self-induced ignorance.
Maybe ABC helped stop some of that ignorance.
Friday, April 11, 2008
Wolf Hunting
On March 28/08, the government's imported wolves went off the endangered species list. Now we can hunt them-legally.
Among the lies the government and environmentalist wackos told us, was that when the wolf population reached 300, they would be taken off the endangered species list. There are now over 5 times that amount. If not for a few property rights advocates, and others, wolves would never be taken off the list.
It is sad when it takes lawsuits to get the government to keep their word-kind of.
We were told that wolves wouldn't leave Yellowston. We, who have lived on the land for generations, knew better, but there are a ignorant people who believe anything they see on tv, or in magazines.
Wolves have spread to Utah, Colorado, and South Dakota. Two collared wolves were killed on highways in S. Dakota. They've been spotted around Sheridan, WY. I saw one of them myself (naturally I didn't have a rifle).
I watched a wolf near Jackson, WY through a rifle scope. It was hard to not pull the trigger. Of course I would have been punished more than if I would have committed a crime against a human.
The wolves killed most of the baby elk from Yellowstone to Jackson. Things like that are always blamed on drought and hunters. Things weak minded people believe.
Another lie told: "there is no documented evidence that wolves have ever harmed a human being". The first thing they did was kill a government biologist, who helped bring them from Canada and babysit them. She was half eaten when they found her. I can't think of a worse way to die.
That was covered up by the leftist/liberal media-it didn't fit their agenda. As was all the other times wolves killed people, or just attacked them. And, killed pets, horses, calves, lambs, etc.
Government wolves (four legged kind), have cost taxpayers millions. For what? Do tourists need to come to Yellowstone Park once in their life to see a wolf? Zoos have wolves, and they're not killing baby animals.
On PBS's wolf propaganda shows once, some goofy tourists were watching a pack of wolves kiling a moose. A bloodthirsty woman said: "oh that is so beautiful". I don't think the moose, who was about the get her flesh torn from her bones, thought it was beautiful.
A few years ago, the cost of these imported baby animal killers was 10 million bucks. The amount is a secret now, but it is millions more. Now, Wyoming has to foot the bill. We have to pay for 4 full-time wolf babysitters. I am sure these guys have to be college educated biologists, and will be paid over 100 thousand a year. That may be as much as half a million bucks the taxpayers of Wyoming will have to cough up-every year.
With the war costing us billions a year, do we need the extra cost of imported predators? I am sure there are a lot of wackos who would rather pay for wolves than fund our life-risking soldiers.
The wolf promoters said wolves would balance nature. Unbelievably, there are people who believe that. They live in a city, and think they know about nature because they have a subscription to Sierra or PETA magazine. And, they think predators only kill the old and sick.
Sure, the moon is made of cheese, and Clinton never inhaled too.
Back when this country had some common sense, when there was too many deer, a hunter could get an extra license, and help get the population down where it needed to be. With the "dumbing down of America", that hasn't been the case for many years.
What do wolves do when they've killed all the baby elk in an area? Do they go hungry for a year or two? Do they go to Walmart and buy dog food to hold them over until the next batch of babies?
I give the governor and legislators of Wyoming`credit for doing what they could about this problem. I wish they could have done more. But, they didn' t cave like their counterparts in Montana and Idaho.
Meanwhile, I'm going hunting.....
Among the lies the government and environmentalist wackos told us, was that when the wolf population reached 300, they would be taken off the endangered species list. There are now over 5 times that amount. If not for a few property rights advocates, and others, wolves would never be taken off the list.
It is sad when it takes lawsuits to get the government to keep their word-kind of.
We were told that wolves wouldn't leave Yellowston. We, who have lived on the land for generations, knew better, but there are a ignorant people who believe anything they see on tv, or in magazines.
Wolves have spread to Utah, Colorado, and South Dakota. Two collared wolves were killed on highways in S. Dakota. They've been spotted around Sheridan, WY. I saw one of them myself (naturally I didn't have a rifle).
I watched a wolf near Jackson, WY through a rifle scope. It was hard to not pull the trigger. Of course I would have been punished more than if I would have committed a crime against a human.
The wolves killed most of the baby elk from Yellowstone to Jackson. Things like that are always blamed on drought and hunters. Things weak minded people believe.
Another lie told: "there is no documented evidence that wolves have ever harmed a human being". The first thing they did was kill a government biologist, who helped bring them from Canada and babysit them. She was half eaten when they found her. I can't think of a worse way to die.
That was covered up by the leftist/liberal media-it didn't fit their agenda. As was all the other times wolves killed people, or just attacked them. And, killed pets, horses, calves, lambs, etc.
Government wolves (four legged kind), have cost taxpayers millions. For what? Do tourists need to come to Yellowstone Park once in their life to see a wolf? Zoos have wolves, and they're not killing baby animals.
On PBS's wolf propaganda shows once, some goofy tourists were watching a pack of wolves kiling a moose. A bloodthirsty woman said: "oh that is so beautiful". I don't think the moose, who was about the get her flesh torn from her bones, thought it was beautiful.
A few years ago, the cost of these imported baby animal killers was 10 million bucks. The amount is a secret now, but it is millions more. Now, Wyoming has to foot the bill. We have to pay for 4 full-time wolf babysitters. I am sure these guys have to be college educated biologists, and will be paid over 100 thousand a year. That may be as much as half a million bucks the taxpayers of Wyoming will have to cough up-every year.
With the war costing us billions a year, do we need the extra cost of imported predators? I am sure there are a lot of wackos who would rather pay for wolves than fund our life-risking soldiers.
The wolf promoters said wolves would balance nature. Unbelievably, there are people who believe that. They live in a city, and think they know about nature because they have a subscription to Sierra or PETA magazine. And, they think predators only kill the old and sick.
Sure, the moon is made of cheese, and Clinton never inhaled too.
Back when this country had some common sense, when there was too many deer, a hunter could get an extra license, and help get the population down where it needed to be. With the "dumbing down of America", that hasn't been the case for many years.
What do wolves do when they've killed all the baby elk in an area? Do they go hungry for a year or two? Do they go to Walmart and buy dog food to hold them over until the next batch of babies?
I give the governor and legislators of Wyoming`credit for doing what they could about this problem. I wish they could have done more. But, they didn' t cave like their counterparts in Montana and Idaho.
Meanwhile, I'm going hunting.....
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Wild Airplane rides
By now, everyone who watches the news at all, has seen the video of the passenger plane trying to land at the airport in Germany on March 1/08. There was a hurricane crosswind, and they nearly wrecked.
The pilot was very skilled, and saved them from a fiery death. One wing even scraped the ground. I would fly with him anytime.
I also had a ride similar to that in 2005. I was on a Viet Nam Airlines jet, coming into Saigon. I think the pilot we had was new at the job, and he hit the ground so hard that we bounced up in the air. Then, when we came down again, the plane was at an angle. The tires were screeching and bouncing, and the plane felt like it was shaking apart.
I have flown many times, all over the world, but I have never had a ride like that before. I hope not to have one like that again. I thought I was going to be in a wreck.
There were people from many countries on that plane, but for a couple minutes everyone was white. When we stopped, a Chinaman and I looked at each other and just shook our heads. It is funny now.
One time in Cambodia, I flew on a local airline, that had old planes with not enough maintenance. One tire on the plane was so worn out that the cords were even worn through. And, the door kept coming open between the cabin and cockpit. That was fun.
Another time, I was in a foreign country, and I saw a rubber raft that flew. I got a ride on the thing, and will never forget that either. It just about cured me of flying. Especially on an ultralight type of airplane.
There was a wind that day, and it blew that thing all around. We were about 500 feet high, and there were no seatbelts or anything. I had to hang onto the seat bottom. Sometimes a head wind blew the raft front up in front of us, and stopped us in the air.
I almost kissed the ground when we got back to the beach.
After all that, I still believe that flying is safer than other ways to travel. But, sometimes it can be thrilling.
The pilot was very skilled, and saved them from a fiery death. One wing even scraped the ground. I would fly with him anytime.
I also had a ride similar to that in 2005. I was on a Viet Nam Airlines jet, coming into Saigon. I think the pilot we had was new at the job, and he hit the ground so hard that we bounced up in the air. Then, when we came down again, the plane was at an angle. The tires were screeching and bouncing, and the plane felt like it was shaking apart.
I have flown many times, all over the world, but I have never had a ride like that before. I hope not to have one like that again. I thought I was going to be in a wreck.
There were people from many countries on that plane, but for a couple minutes everyone was white. When we stopped, a Chinaman and I looked at each other and just shook our heads. It is funny now.
One time in Cambodia, I flew on a local airline, that had old planes with not enough maintenance. One tire on the plane was so worn out that the cords were even worn through. And, the door kept coming open between the cabin and cockpit. That was fun.
Another time, I was in a foreign country, and I saw a rubber raft that flew. I got a ride on the thing, and will never forget that either. It just about cured me of flying. Especially on an ultralight type of airplane.
There was a wind that day, and it blew that thing all around. We were about 500 feet high, and there were no seatbelts or anything. I had to hang onto the seat bottom. Sometimes a head wind blew the raft front up in front of us, and stopped us in the air.
I almost kissed the ground when we got back to the beach.
After all that, I still believe that flying is safer than other ways to travel. But, sometimes it can be thrilling.
Wolves Off Endangered Species List
As I write this, it is March 28/08, the day the government's imported wolves go off the endangered species list. Now we can hunt them-legally.
Among the lies the government and environmentalist wackos told us, was that when the wolf population reached 300, they would be taken off the endangered species list. There are now over 5 times that amount (about 1500 wolves). And, only constant pressure has made the government finally do something. If not for a few property rights advocates, and others, wolves would probably never be taken off the list.
It is sad when it takes lawsuits etc, to get the government to keep their word-kind of.
Of course among the lies we were told about wolves, is that they would not leave Yellowstone Park. We, who have lived on the land for generations, knew better than that, but there are a lot of ignorant people who believe anything they see on their tv sets, or in Sierra magazines.
The wolves have spread all the way to Utah, Colorado, and South Dakota. It was in the news that two collared wolves were killed on highways in S. Dakota. They have been spotted both east and west of Sheridan, WY. Three were seen east of Sheridan, and I saw one of them myself (naturally I didn't have a rifle).
I watched a wolf near Jackson, WY through a rifle scope. I was really hard to not pull the trigger. Of course I would have been punished more for that than if I would have commited a crime against a human.
The wolves have already killed most of the baby elk from Yellowstone to Jackson. And, of course things like that are always blamed on drought and hunters. Things weakminded people believe.
Another lie we were told is the one saying: "there is no documented evidence that wolves have ever harmed a human being". The first thing they did was kill a woman government bioligist, who helped bring them from Canada and babysit them. She was half eaten when they found her. I can't think of a worse way to die.
That was covered up by the leftist/liberal media-it didn't fit their agenda. As was all the other times wolves killed people, or just attacked them. And, killed their pets, horses, baby calves, lambs, etc. etc.
The government wolves (four legged kind), have cost us taxpayers millions of dollars. For what? Why do we need them? Do the tourists have to come to Yellowstone Park once in their life to see a wolf? The zoos have wolves, and they are not killing baby animals.
I saw one of PBS's wolf propaganda shows once, and a bunch of goofy tourists were watching a pack of wolves trying to kill a moose. A bloodthirsty woman said: "oh that is so beautiful". I don't think the moose, who was about the get her flesh torn from her bones, thought it was beautiful.
A few years ago, the cost of these imported baby animal killers was 10 million bucks. The amount is a secret now, but it is many millions more. And now, the state of Wyoming has to foot the bill. We have to pay for 4 full-time wolf babysitters. I am sure these guys have to be college educated bioligists, and will be paid over 100 thousand a year. That may be as much as half a million bucks the taxpayers of Wyoming will have to cough up.
With the war costing us billions a year, do we need the extra cost of imported predators? I am sure there are a lot of wackos who would rather pay for wolves than fund our life-risking soldiers.
One of the excuses the wolf-promoters gave, was that there were too many elk, and the wolves would balance nature. Unbelievably, there are poeple who believe that bull. They live in a city, and think they know all about nature because they have a subscription to Sierra or PETA magazine. And, they think predators only kill the old and sick too..
The moon is made of cheese, and Clinton never inhaled too.
Back when this country still had some common sense, when there was too many deer, elk, etc. a hunter could get an extra license, and help get the population down where it needed to be. With the "dumbing down of America", that has not been the case for many years.
What do the wolves do when they have killed all the baby elk in an area? Do they go hungry for a year or two? Do they go to Walmart and buy dog food to hold them over until the next batch of babies?
I will have to give the governor and legislators of Wyoming`credit for doing what they could about this problem. I wish they could have done more. But, they didn' t cave like their counterparts in Montana and Idaho.
Meanwhile, I'm going hunting.....
Among the lies the government and environmentalist wackos told us, was that when the wolf population reached 300, they would be taken off the endangered species list. There are now over 5 times that amount (about 1500 wolves). And, only constant pressure has made the government finally do something. If not for a few property rights advocates, and others, wolves would probably never be taken off the list.
It is sad when it takes lawsuits etc, to get the government to keep their word-kind of.
Of course among the lies we were told about wolves, is that they would not leave Yellowstone Park. We, who have lived on the land for generations, knew better than that, but there are a lot of ignorant people who believe anything they see on their tv sets, or in Sierra magazines.
The wolves have spread all the way to Utah, Colorado, and South Dakota. It was in the news that two collared wolves were killed on highways in S. Dakota. They have been spotted both east and west of Sheridan, WY. Three were seen east of Sheridan, and I saw one of them myself (naturally I didn't have a rifle).
I watched a wolf near Jackson, WY through a rifle scope. I was really hard to not pull the trigger. Of course I would have been punished more for that than if I would have commited a crime against a human.
The wolves have already killed most of the baby elk from Yellowstone to Jackson. And, of course things like that are always blamed on drought and hunters. Things weakminded people believe.
Another lie we were told is the one saying: "there is no documented evidence that wolves have ever harmed a human being". The first thing they did was kill a woman government bioligist, who helped bring them from Canada and babysit them. She was half eaten when they found her. I can't think of a worse way to die.
That was covered up by the leftist/liberal media-it didn't fit their agenda. As was all the other times wolves killed people, or just attacked them. And, killed their pets, horses, baby calves, lambs, etc. etc.
The government wolves (four legged kind), have cost us taxpayers millions of dollars. For what? Why do we need them? Do the tourists have to come to Yellowstone Park once in their life to see a wolf? The zoos have wolves, and they are not killing baby animals.
I saw one of PBS's wolf propaganda shows once, and a bunch of goofy tourists were watching a pack of wolves trying to kill a moose. A bloodthirsty woman said: "oh that is so beautiful". I don't think the moose, who was about the get her flesh torn from her bones, thought it was beautiful.
A few years ago, the cost of these imported baby animal killers was 10 million bucks. The amount is a secret now, but it is many millions more. And now, the state of Wyoming has to foot the bill. We have to pay for 4 full-time wolf babysitters. I am sure these guys have to be college educated bioligists, and will be paid over 100 thousand a year. That may be as much as half a million bucks the taxpayers of Wyoming will have to cough up.
With the war costing us billions a year, do we need the extra cost of imported predators? I am sure there are a lot of wackos who would rather pay for wolves than fund our life-risking soldiers.
One of the excuses the wolf-promoters gave, was that there were too many elk, and the wolves would balance nature. Unbelievably, there are poeple who believe that bull. They live in a city, and think they know all about nature because they have a subscription to Sierra or PETA magazine. And, they think predators only kill the old and sick too..
The moon is made of cheese, and Clinton never inhaled too.
Back when this country still had some common sense, when there was too many deer, elk, etc. a hunter could get an extra license, and help get the population down where it needed to be. With the "dumbing down of America", that has not been the case for many years.
What do the wolves do when they have killed all the baby elk in an area? Do they go hungry for a year or two? Do they go to Walmart and buy dog food to hold them over until the next batch of babies?
I will have to give the governor and legislators of Wyoming`credit for doing what they could about this problem. I wish they could have done more. But, they didn' t cave like their counterparts in Montana and Idaho.
Meanwhile, I'm going hunting.....
Monday, March 24, 2008
Hussein Obama
Unless someone lives in a cave, they know by now what kind of a guy Obama is. His racist, bigoted, hate mongering, preacher says it all. He literally cusses America, etc.
When people go to a church, it is because they believe in, and agree with their preacher. You can go to google.com, newmax.com, Fox.com, or other online sites and see videos of Obama's church services-and his pastor Wright. It is scary to think we might have someone like Obama in the White House-with access to nukes!
Here is what I wrote last week:
A person in Sheridan, Wy asked, in an editorial, what the facts are about Barack Obama? I will attempt to answer that somewhat. But, it is not easy. The liberal media is keeping quiet about his background, to suit their agenda, which is to get him elected.
I have been trying to learn what I can about this guy. And this is what I believe are the facts: If I am wrong on anything, someone let us know-with verifiable sources. No gossip or plain bull.
The liberal media, and political parties, have suppressed anyone calling this guy by his full name, which is: Barack Hussein Obama. They don't want anyone to know he has a Muslim name, and a name like the former dictator of Iraq. So, I will call him Hussein Obama from now on.
He was born to a Muslim father from Kenya, and a white American mother (she may be an atheist). As with 60% of black American fathers (numbers from Bill Cosby), Hussein Obama's father abandoned his family. He went back to Africa.
Obama's mother married another black Muslim, and they went to live in Indonesia, which has the most Muslims per capita, than any country in the world. Hussein Obama went to Muslim schools, and was registered as a Muslim.
Simply put, Obama was born and raised a Muslim.
Supposedly Obama changed his religion to Christian. He goes to a black supremist church, where the preacher is in trouble right now for his non-religious political activities, AKA federal crimes. Obama is using this church to promote himself and raise money for himself. He has given this church over $22,000 since he has been a member.
If Obama did actually change from Muslim to Christian, as he wants us to believe, he would be killed if he still lived in a Muslim country.
I don't know if Obama swore on a Koran when elected to senate, I haven't been able to find facts on that yet. I don't think he would do that if elected to president, as that would detract from his agenda. Which is: power.
The first thing Obama, or Mrs. Clinton, would do, is raise taxes. Of course, those who live on the backs of working people, like that. More handouts for them.
The next thing Hussein Obama, would do, is pass laws against our gun rights. He, and Hillary, have voted that way already. He will have a Democrat controlled congress to help him do that.
If someone doesn't know that Democrats raise taxes, pass laws against our gun rights, and are pro-abortion, they are very ignorant of the facts. Also, does anyone think they tell us that before they get elected? Wake up people!
I am going to vote for the least leftist of the 3 candidates left: John McCain. Is he the best? No, but he is the best one
When people go to a church, it is because they believe in, and agree with their preacher. You can go to google.com, newmax.com, Fox.com, or other online sites and see videos of Obama's church services-and his pastor Wright. It is scary to think we might have someone like Obama in the White House-with access to nukes!
Here is what I wrote last week:
A person in Sheridan, Wy asked, in an editorial, what the facts are about Barack Obama? I will attempt to answer that somewhat. But, it is not easy. The liberal media is keeping quiet about his background, to suit their agenda, which is to get him elected.
I have been trying to learn what I can about this guy. And this is what I believe are the facts: If I am wrong on anything, someone let us know-with verifiable sources. No gossip or plain bull.
The liberal media, and political parties, have suppressed anyone calling this guy by his full name, which is: Barack Hussein Obama. They don't want anyone to know he has a Muslim name, and a name like the former dictator of Iraq. So, I will call him Hussein Obama from now on.
He was born to a Muslim father from Kenya, and a white American mother (she may be an atheist). As with 60% of black American fathers (numbers from Bill Cosby), Hussein Obama's father abandoned his family. He went back to Africa.
Obama's mother married another black Muslim, and they went to live in Indonesia, which has the most Muslims per capita, than any country in the world. Hussein Obama went to Muslim schools, and was registered as a Muslim.
Simply put, Obama was born and raised a Muslim.
Supposedly Obama changed his religion to Christian. He goes to a black supremist church, where the preacher is in trouble right now for his non-religious political activities, AKA federal crimes. Obama is using this church to promote himself and raise money for himself. He has given this church over $22,000 since he has been a member.
If Obama did actually change from Muslim to Christian, as he wants us to believe, he would be killed if he still lived in a Muslim country.
I don't know if Obama swore on a Koran when elected to senate, I haven't been able to find facts on that yet. I don't think he would do that if elected to president, as that would detract from his agenda. Which is: power.
The first thing Obama, or Mrs. Clinton, would do, is raise taxes. Of course, those who live on the backs of working people, like that. More handouts for them.
The next thing Hussein Obama, would do, is pass laws against our gun rights. He, and Hillary, have voted that way already. He will have a Democrat controlled congress to help him do that.
If someone doesn't know that Democrats raise taxes, pass laws against our gun rights, and are pro-abortion, they are very ignorant of the facts. Also, does anyone think they tell us that before they get elected? Wake up people!
I am going to vote for the least leftist of the 3 candidates left: John McCain. Is he the best? No, but he is the best one
Monday, March 3, 2008
Conservative Bill Sez: The Weather Channel founder, John Coleman, says to sue Al Gore over global warming
John Coleman, who founded The Weather Channel, says that there should be a lawsuit against the global warming claims by Al Gore and others. They should be sued in order to expose the truth.
And, he says "the weather channel has lost it's way". They are also harping about man-made global warming.
Mr Coleman spoke at the 2008 International Conference On Climate Change (March 3/08), in New York. He talked about the "fraud of global warming". He said to sue those who sell carbon credits, including Al Gore, and that would force a more honest account by the global warming alarmists, of the policies they propose.
And, he said the lawsuit, if taken up by lawyers, would "finally put some light on the fraud of global warming". The so-called experts would have to testify, under oath, and that would generate a lot of publicity.
Earlier at the conference, Lord Christopher Monckton, the advisor to former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, said that science will eventually prevail. And, "the scare of global warming will go away". He said the courts are a good way to show the science.
So, more and more credible people are coming forward and proclaiming that this so-called "global warming" is a farce, and a scheme to make money.
More on this at businessandmedia.org.
And, he says "the weather channel has lost it's way". They are also harping about man-made global warming.
Mr Coleman spoke at the 2008 International Conference On Climate Change (March 3/08), in New York. He talked about the "fraud of global warming". He said to sue those who sell carbon credits, including Al Gore, and that would force a more honest account by the global warming alarmists, of the policies they propose.
And, he said the lawsuit, if taken up by lawyers, would "finally put some light on the fraud of global warming". The so-called experts would have to testify, under oath, and that would generate a lot of publicity.
Earlier at the conference, Lord Christopher Monckton, the advisor to former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, said that science will eventually prevail. And, "the scare of global warming will go away". He said the courts are a good way to show the science.
So, more and more credible people are coming forward and proclaiming that this so-called "global warming" is a farce, and a scheme to make money.
More on this at businessandmedia.org.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)