Margaret Thatcher For US Prez

Australia's Gun Ban Stats

Read Before Democrats Take Our Guns

~ A LITTLE GUN HISTORY
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. >From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were ro...

unded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armen ians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated
------------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
---- ------------- -------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
------------------------------
You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.
With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.
During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!
If you value your freedom, please spread this antigun-control message to all of your friends.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN!
SWITZERLAND'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE.
SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
IT'S A NO BRAINER!
DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.
I'm a firm believer in the 2nd Amendmen

 

This info came from the organization: Prepare To Take Back America

People Saved By Guns

The Pictures The Democrat-controlled News Shows Won't Show

WHAT THEY DID TO AMBASSADOR STEVENS JUST BEFORE OBAMA WENT TO HIS FUND RAISER IN LAS VEGAS

Democrats War on Women

DONT FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO SARAH PALIIN

Obama's Failures

How Many Americans Voted in 2012?

Flip Flop Obama

Who Pays The Taxes

Do not send me Spam, Obamacrats.

Obama Election Map

Obama Election Map

Obama Lost The Washington Post

 I did not write this. But, I think everyone should read it, so here it is:

THE WASHINGTON POST HITS OBAMA

Finally, the Washington Post and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely

and tough. As many of you know, the Washington Post and Newsweek have a reputation

for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editors saw fit to print

the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our

President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the

“protective wall” built around him by the liberal media.

___________________________

I Too Have Become Disillusioned

By Matt Patterson (columnist - Washington Post, New York Post, San

Francisco Examiner)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack

Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a

baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the

Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of

professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could

manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful

military, execute the world's most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life:

ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his

presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama

was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat

themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow.

Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough

for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for

anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.

Obamacare Exposed

 Obamacare is worse than I thought. And, obviously I knew it would be bad. It is the biggest tax increase this country has ever seen. Especially if you include the fines and penalties it forces on us.
 I had the privilege of attending a meeting of Wyoming leaders. We shared our knowledge of what Obamacare was going to do to the US. Some of the things discussed were scary.
 I don't understand why people want the government to completely take over their healthcare. I guess they just think it will mean more handouts for them. However, the truth is, we will all have to pay out the nose.
 Here are some of the facts, and  I will have to be brief for space.
 First, the laughingly named "Affordable Care Act" bill is longer than the Bible (I checked). And, the Obamacrats hero: Nancy Pelosi said "We have to pass this bill so people can find out what's in it". The Dem-controlled Congress passed it and admitted they didn't even know what was in it (smart).
 Obamacare cuts Medicare $716 Billion. If I were an old retired person, I would be worried. But, most of them will vote for Obama-again.
 People who don't pay for Obamacare will be fined and could go to jail. Obama is hiring more IRS agents, as they will be in charge of forcing us  to pay. They will take the fines out of our tax refunds, and, if that is not enough, they will take the money out of our bank accounts-which they will have records of.
 They will also have computer records of every time you go to the doctor and why. If you had VD or an abortion when you were a kid, the gov. will have records of it when you are 90.
 Obamacare will bankrupt your insurance co. so you will have to get all your insurance from the Feds. Your premiums will go up 40 to 60% (mine have already).
 There will be fewer doctors. They don't want to get paid less and have more paperwork.
 States, employers, and individuals, will pay the price ($65 Billion) in ten years. Not the Feds who impose it.
 A 15 man "Death Panel" will decide who gets medical care (I remember when Obama told a lady that her 80 year old mother will get pain killers-and that's all).
 It stops FSA, HSA, and HRA deductions on income taxes.
  It stops tax deductions for employer-provided retirement drug coverage.
 A $50,000 a year fine on Charitable Hospitals who don't comply completely.
 Employers will have to pay for abortions, abortion pills and contraceptives.
 The tax increases are:
 Employers tax of up to $3,000 per year for each employee.
Taxes on investment income increases.
Capital Gains tax goes from 15% to 23.8% on $200.000+ incomes.
Some dividends and other investments go to 43.4%.
Medicare payroll tax.
Medical devices 2.3% more.
 Higher Blue Cross/Blue Shield costs.
A $2.3 Billion tax on inventive drug companies.
 A bio-fuel tax.
Insurance co. tax.
More taxes on comprehensive health insurance.
 And, the IRS can disallow any, and all, tax deductions to pay for Obamacare.
 Does anybody remember when Obama promised that he would not raise taxes on the middle class? That would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
 I have experienced Obamacare in Communist Vietnam a few years ago. It is the same, basically. About a hundred people stand in line for a few hours waiting to see a doctor. The doctor is paid the same for one patient or a hundred. Of course there are not enough doctors. The gov. controls everything. The hospitals are run down, and the people are treated like sheep.
 That is what the Democrats want.
 Romney  promised to stop Obamacare as soon as he takes office. We will hold him to that. Guess who I am voting for?

Incompetent Obama

 Obama really torqued me off when he said: "If you have a business, you didn't build that, someone else did". I will always remember him for that. It is kind of like Clinton who is remembered for saying: "I didn't have sexual relations with that woman". Of course these guys are birds of a feather, except Obama is worse.
 I started working alongside grown men when I was 7. I started driving a tractor in the hay fields.
 When I was 19, I started becoming a businessman, when I bought a house, rented it out, and became a landlord. By the time I was 26, I owned 3 houses and a ranch. That was when I started my own excavating business, after helping someone start theirs. When I was 38, I starting my ranching business.
 Then, Obama, who has never even had a lemonade stand business, or a REAL job even, tells me I didn't build my business. What kind of pompous ass is he anyway?
 This guy has had everything handed to him all his life, and doesn't know what it's like to have renters who think you are a kid, so they don't have to pay their rent. Or have jealous competitors who try to destroy your excavating business, because you are lower priced and do better work.
 He only knew how to get someone else to pay for his college, and his political schemes. And, how to help ACORN make dead people and illegal aliens vote for Democrats.
 Now, he has admitted his "Hope and Change" baloney is nothing but Hype and Blame, when he said: "you can't change Washington from the inside". Wasn't he elected to change Washington from the inside? Was everything he said, to get elected, nothing but pure bull manure?
 If I had to pick one printable word to describe Obama, it would be Phony. However, the second would be Incompetent. Of course you can include Socialist, Abortionist, etc.
 Why anyone would vote for Obama again, and get 4 more years of the same, is baffling to me. Go figure.

                                                

Obama's Inheritance

An Open Letter To The American People By Our Forefathers

Andy Griffith, We Need You Now

  I was saddened when I heard that Andy Griffith died. I never used to miss his show when I was a kid. He was a REAL role model for many young people like myself.
 Now, the TV shows are about sex, violence, homosexuality, liberalism, anti-Americaism, anti-Christianism, pro-abortionism, etc. Everything except something wholesome and decent for kids to emulate.
 They insult your intelligence with shows that say something stupid, and play the laugh machine as if something was funny. I can't stand to watch this garbage.
 I usually watch the news, which although it's controlled by the Democrat party, is informative-if you watch it objectively. And, keep in mind is mostly liberal propaganda.
 Then, I shut off the TV and pick up a good history book, or biography. I also have read the holy books of the four main world's religions-which is interesting.
 I wish the kids today had a good decent wholesome TV show to watch, like the Andy Grifffith Show. I don't know of one. That is sad.
 Andy, may you rest in peace. But, we need you now more than ever.

                                                        "Conservative Bill" Ackerley
                                                          

John Edwards, The President of Disgusting

 John Edwards, with his 400 dollar haircuts, immoral acts, and lack of conscience, is the most disgusting American I know of. He makes Bill Clinton look good.
 I will never forget when he tried to run for president. A Democrat woman tried to make excuses for his 400 dollar haircuts, by saying that haircuts cost a lot in Washington. She was so brainwashed by her party that it never dawned on her that he could get a cheaper haircut when he went to his own state on weekends.
 I will say he has a nice hair do, but my question is: were his haircuts paid for by his campaign donations? Or government funds? Liberal Democrats don't pay their own bills when they can make the public do it.
 As for lack of conscience, what kind of guy goes around and has sex with blond floozies while he wife is in bed dying of cancer? I have never heard of anyone that low before. Now, this woman has been making the TV shows, and of course she has a book she is promoting-and will get rich for commiting adultry with a married man.
 His trial, for illegal spending of campaign funds, was nothing but a circus. The liberal stacked jury were obviously on his side. One of the females even flirted with him during the trial. I am sure she met him at a motel later.
 They treated the trial as a joke. They even color matched their clothes as part of the fun they were having.
 I think this is a good example of America's decaying society. When I was a kid, the screaming all across the country would be deafening. Now, if you walked down the street and asked people about this trial, they would say: huh? However, if you asked them about Madonna showing her privates in a Muslim country, they know about that.
 If the Democratic Party continues to back John Edwards, I will lose what little respect I have for them. I think someone should try to restore the morals in this country, and try to be an example to the world like we used to be.
                                                                 

I am publishing this as everyone should read it...

WND EXCLUSIVE

Socialist party covering up Obama's membership?

Denial contradicted by documentation, group's own literature

Published: 7 days ago

byAaron KleinEmail | Archive

Aaron Klein is WND's senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on New York's WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.More ↓Less ↑

Barack Obama’s 2008 political campaign may not be the only ones caught making possibly misleading statements about the sitting president’s alleged membership in the 1990′s socialist-leaning New Party.
The now defunct New Party’s founder, University of Wisconsin Professor Joel Rogers, is currently denying his organization had ever had any members, thus making it impossible for Obama to have ever been an official member.
Speaking last week to Buzzfeed.com editor Ben Smith, Rogers stated of Obama’s purported membership: “I have no idea what the Chicago people were saying about him being a member. …We didn’t have membership, it wasn’t a membership organization.”
Rogers gave a similar statement to Smith in 2008. At the time, Smith, writing for Politico.com, contacted Rogers for comment on reports Obama was a New Party member.”
We didn’t really have members,” said Rogers at the time.
WND, however, found scores of reports from the 1990s describing members of the New Party.
In a Nov. 1, 1995 article entitled, “Third-party blues: Do African Americans need an independent party?” for example, Michael Fisby of the Black Enterprise interviewed New Party founder Dan Cantor and reported on New Party members.
“The little-known New Party has about 5,000 members, half of whom are black, and has run candidates in 115 elections, from school boards to zoning commissions,” reported Fisby. “They’ve won an astonishing 77 races.”
On Feb. 10, 1997, The Nation magazine featured an article about the New Party’s New York branch, also describing members of the party.
Reported The Nation: “The New Party … is the only group with dues-paying members (a hundred each in Brooklyn and Long Island chapters) and boasts the only paid organizer in the field.”
In 2009, WND reported on newspaper evidence from the New Party’s own literature listing several new members of the New Party, including Obama.
At the time, Obama’s camp categorically denied he was ever a member of the New Party, which sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.
The denial came amid reports of Obama’s participation with the party, including several articles by WND.
WND also conducted an exclusive interview with Marxist activist Carl Davidson, a founder of the New Party, who recounted Obama’s participation.
Last week, researcher and author Stanley Kurtz, writing at National Review Online, reported on documentation from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society that “definitively establishes” that Obama was a member of the New Party.
Kurtz reported Obama also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.
In 2008, Obama’s Fight the Smears campaign website quoted Carol Harwell, who managed Obama’s 1996 campaign for the Illinois Senate, as stating: “Barack did not solicit or seek the New Party endorsement for state senator in 1995.”
Fight the Smears conceded the New Party did support Obama in 1996 but denied that Obama had ever joined.
According to documents from the Democratic Socialists of America, the New Party worked with ACORN to promote its candidates. ACORN, convicted in massive, nationwide voter fraud cases, was a point of controversy for Obama during his 2008 campaign for president.
Becoming a New Party member required some effort on behalf of the politician. Candidates must be approved by the party’s political committee and, once approved, must sign a contract mandating they will have a “visible and active relationship” with the party.
If Obama indeed signed the contract, not only would his campaign be caught in a lie but it could also prove highly embarrassing for him at a time when he is fighting claims, including from Mitt Romney’s camp, that his policies are socialist.
Also, Obama’s 2012 campaign slogan of “Forward” has been criticized for its use of a historic socialist slogan.
Socialist goals
The socialist-oriented goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.
Among the New Party’s stated objectives were “full employment, a shorter work week and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal ‘social wage’ to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth; and like programs to ensure gender equity.”
The New Party stated it also sought “the democratization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets [and] community-controlled alternative financial institutions.”
Many of the New Party’s founding members were Democratic Socialists of America leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA.
Last month, WND reported on a 1996 print advertisement in a local Chicago newspaper that shows Obama was the speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.
WND first reported on the event in 2010.
Obama listed as New Party member
While Obama’s campaign in 2008 denied the then–presidential candidate was ever an actual member of the New Party, print copies of the New Party News, the party’s official newspaper, show Obama posing with New Party leaders, listing him as a New Party member and printing quotes from him as a member.
The party’s spring 1996 newspaper boasted: “New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).”
The paper quoted Obama saying, “These victories prove that small ‘d’ democracy can work.”
The newspaper lists other politicians it endorsed who were not members but specifies Obama as a New Party member.
New Ground, the newsletter of Chicago’s Democratic Socialists of America, reported in its July/August 1996 edition that Obama attended a New Party membership meeting April 11, 1996, in which he expressed his gratitude for the group’s support and “encouraged NPers (New Party members) to join in his task forces on voter education and voter registration.”
With research by Brenda J.

Reagan/Obama? Oh Give Me A Break!

Barack Hussein Obama, as part of his re-election campaign, is trying to compare himself with President Ronald Reagan. Is he serious? Or is this some kind of joke?
 On April 11/12, Obama promoted his so-called "Buffett Rule" tax increase. He said it is like Reagan's 1985 tax proposal.
 I remember Reagan, I'm proud to say I voted for Reagan, and, Obama is no Reagan. After Obama put this country 5 Trillion bucks farther in debt, and after the election, he is going to push for even more debt, he is blaming the Republicans for not helping him bankrupt the country.
 We cannot afford 4 more years of tax increases, increased spending, and increased government riding on our backs. And, the Obama family's worldwide taxpayer paid vacations.
 In Nov. you don't have to be a big fan of Mitt Romney, just vote against Obama-the worst president in American History. Our future depends on it.
 Only a fool would do otherwise.

The Titanic, 100 Years Ago

As I write this, it is April 14/12, and one century ago, the Titanic sank. This is a sad occasion, and the subject of movies. But, I prefer to remember the Heroes who gave their lives so others might live.
 The engineers, boiler room workers, pump operators, electricians, officers, and many unknown people worked to keep the ship afloat as long as they could, saving over 700 lives. And, the heroic radio operator who was still calling for help, minutes before going to his icy grave.
 And, don't forget the men who stayed on the ship, so women and kids could survive on the too few lifeboats. There were some women who refused to leave their husbands side, and died in their arms. That is love.
 I wonder what would happen today? Would there be as many heroes? It seems like it is just every man for himself today. But, in a disaster, people who may not agree in their religions and politics, help each other when needed.
 I have wondered if I were on the Titanic, what would I do? That question is hard to answer without actually being in the situation. Maybe I would be playing with the band. Those guys might play music with the angels when the time comes.
 My wife said she would not leave my side on the ship, and I know that is true. I am a lucky/blessed man. I don't have to be on the Titanic to know that.

Is Obama's Daughter in Mexico For Spring Break?

 Obama's daughter is in Mexico for spring break. And, she is only 13 years old. This was not reported by the Democrat-controlled media until the area she was in had an earthquake.
 Of course those of us who get info from non-Democrat news sources, already knew about this many days ago. However, Obama declared his kids to be off limits, and the news shows have respected that. Unlike when the Democrat-controlled TV shows attacked Sara Palin's daughters, and said things like joking about one of them getting raped by a black basketball player.
 Of course we conservatives already know about the two-faced media.
 The point is, we the people, can not afford the wild sprending spree Obama family. Obama has put this country 5 trillion dollars farther in debt, " Michelle Antionette" has traveled all over the world-many times at our expense, and now their daughter is traveling on her own at our expense.
 She went to Mexico, which is not safe (especially since the Obama bunch exported assault weapons to Mexican drug gangs in the Fast And Furious scandal), with 25 Secret Service agents and 12 of her friends.  Whose brilliant idea was this?
 How much has this spring break cost we taxpayers? And don't you elderly people love how your Social Security and Medicare have been cut back since Obama got elected? You have to give up things so the Obama family, and their friends, have more money to spend.
 Oh well, just vote for him again because your TV tells you to-again.
 Notice how I have not mentioned Obama's daughter's name? I don't attack a professional politician's kids like the Liberal Democrats do. Only anti-American things their parents do.

                                                                       "Conservative Bill"
                                                                         

Paul Krugman, Obama-Worshiper

What Is An Abortionist? From Brian Kemper

This Says It All

I support those who support the Constitution.

Queen Obama On Jay Leno

Queen Obama will be on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno tonight, Jan. 31/12. Leno announced it on his show last night.
 Something stood out as it was announced: the  audience applause was very weak. When Leno announced the other future guests, they got a large response. When he mentioned wild spending Michelle (Michelle Antionette), not so much.
 People are learning.
 It is estimated that she has cost the taxpayers over 10 millions bucks-so far, since her husband got elected with help from the currupt ACORN, the Communist Party USA, and thousands of dead people (who had a little help from the Democratic Party).
 We won't mention the Trillions her husband has cost us.
 Her  spending spree includes vacations in many other foreign countries, like S. Africa, Spain, England, etc. Her friends have gone on these free trips too.
 I will watch the Tonight Show on NBC.com later, and see what kind of worship the peons in the audience give her.
 One thing you can be sure of, they will be warned against booing and name-calling. So much for freedom of expression.

King and Queen Obama

King and Queen Obama have gone back to Washington after their 10 day, 4 million dollar tax payer paid, vacation in Hawaii. And, as a good socialist, the first thing Obama did was to make one of his accomplices the head of another Federal agency he created. All without input from Congress-just whimpering.
 As is her habit, "Michelle Antionette" Obama left for Hawaii 3 days earlier than her husband, which cost the taxpayers 100,000 bucks. She flies all over the world in a luxurious converted military-type cargo plane. Of course she probably feels abused as her husband flies all over with two 757s, and goes on his campaign trail with two imported 1.1 million dollar taxpayer paid campaign buses-like the rock star the Democrat Media calls him.
 I found out that that horrible W. Bush used to go to his ranch the day after Christmas, so the Secret Service agents could celebrate with their families. That was no problem for the Obamas, they left days before Christmas, with not regard for the agents forced to go too.
 More elitism.
 The point is, we can't afford these rich Democrat Elitists. Is case someone hasn't noticed it yet, we are in a recession. And, teetering on the edge of a full blown depression, and maybe a government bankruptcy. I think the voters have brains enough to replace Obama, but I don't know if we can survive the year he has left.
Of course leftists like my old college professor, Doug Parrott (Sheridan, Wy college), will still make excuses for his Messiah and "Michelle Antionette". However, I talked to a Cummunist who is a retired Harvard professor, which is where Obama got some of his socialist ideas, and this man told me he is against Obama now. He said he fell for the "Hope and Change" bull.
 Of course some people are slow learners. I just hope we have a country left when King and Queen Obama leave OUR White House.