John Edwards, The President of Disgusting

 John Edwards, with his 400 dollar haircuts, immoral acts, and lack of conscience, is the most disgusting American I know of. He makes Bill Clinton look good.
 I will never forget when he tried to run for president. A Democrat woman tried to make excuses for his 400 dollar haircuts, by saying that haircuts cost a lot in Washington. She was so brainwashed by her party that it never dawned on her that he could get a cheaper haircut when he went to his own state on weekends.
 I will say he has a nice hair do, but my question is: were his haircuts paid for by his campaign donations? Or government funds? Liberal Democrats don't pay their own bills when they can make the public do it.
 As for lack of conscience, what kind of guy goes around and has sex with blond floozies while he wife is in bed dying of cancer? I have never heard of anyone that low before. Now, this woman has been making the TV shows, and of course she has a book she is promoting-and will get rich for commiting adultry with a married man.
 His trial, for illegal spending of campaign funds, was nothing but a circus. The liberal stacked jury were obviously on his side. One of the females even flirted with him during the trial. I am sure she met him at a motel later.
 They treated the trial as a joke. They even color matched their clothes as part of the fun they were having.
 I think this is a good example of America's decaying society. When I was a kid, the screaming all across the country would be deafening. Now, if you walked down the street and asked people about this trial, they would say: huh? However, if you asked them about Madonna showing her privates in a Muslim country, they know about that.
 If the Democratic Party continues to back John Edwards, I will lose what little respect I have for them. I think someone should try to restore the morals in this country, and try to be an example to the world like we used to be.
                                                                 

I am publishing this as everyone should read it...

WND EXCLUSIVE

Socialist party covering up Obama's membership?

Denial contradicted by documentation, group's own literature

Published: 7 days ago

byAaron KleinEmail | Archive

Aaron Klein is WND's senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on New York's WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.More ↓Less ↑

Barack Obama’s 2008 political campaign may not be the only ones caught making possibly misleading statements about the sitting president’s alleged membership in the 1990′s socialist-leaning New Party.
The now defunct New Party’s founder, University of Wisconsin Professor Joel Rogers, is currently denying his organization had ever had any members, thus making it impossible for Obama to have ever been an official member.
Speaking last week to Buzzfeed.com editor Ben Smith, Rogers stated of Obama’s purported membership: “I have no idea what the Chicago people were saying about him being a member. …We didn’t have membership, it wasn’t a membership organization.”
Rogers gave a similar statement to Smith in 2008. At the time, Smith, writing for Politico.com, contacted Rogers for comment on reports Obama was a New Party member.”
We didn’t really have members,” said Rogers at the time.
WND, however, found scores of reports from the 1990s describing members of the New Party.
In a Nov. 1, 1995 article entitled, “Third-party blues: Do African Americans need an independent party?” for example, Michael Fisby of the Black Enterprise interviewed New Party founder Dan Cantor and reported on New Party members.
“The little-known New Party has about 5,000 members, half of whom are black, and has run candidates in 115 elections, from school boards to zoning commissions,” reported Fisby. “They’ve won an astonishing 77 races.”
On Feb. 10, 1997, The Nation magazine featured an article about the New Party’s New York branch, also describing members of the party.
Reported The Nation: “The New Party … is the only group with dues-paying members (a hundred each in Brooklyn and Long Island chapters) and boasts the only paid organizer in the field.”
In 2009, WND reported on newspaper evidence from the New Party’s own literature listing several new members of the New Party, including Obama.
At the time, Obama’s camp categorically denied he was ever a member of the New Party, which sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.
The denial came amid reports of Obama’s participation with the party, including several articles by WND.
WND also conducted an exclusive interview with Marxist activist Carl Davidson, a founder of the New Party, who recounted Obama’s participation.
Last week, researcher and author Stanley Kurtz, writing at National Review Online, reported on documentation from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society that “definitively establishes” that Obama was a member of the New Party.
Kurtz reported Obama also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.
In 2008, Obama’s Fight the Smears campaign website quoted Carol Harwell, who managed Obama’s 1996 campaign for the Illinois Senate, as stating: “Barack did not solicit or seek the New Party endorsement for state senator in 1995.”
Fight the Smears conceded the New Party did support Obama in 1996 but denied that Obama had ever joined.
According to documents from the Democratic Socialists of America, the New Party worked with ACORN to promote its candidates. ACORN, convicted in massive, nationwide voter fraud cases, was a point of controversy for Obama during his 2008 campaign for president.
Becoming a New Party member required some effort on behalf of the politician. Candidates must be approved by the party’s political committee and, once approved, must sign a contract mandating they will have a “visible and active relationship” with the party.
If Obama indeed signed the contract, not only would his campaign be caught in a lie but it could also prove highly embarrassing for him at a time when he is fighting claims, including from Mitt Romney’s camp, that his policies are socialist.
Also, Obama’s 2012 campaign slogan of “Forward” has been criticized for its use of a historic socialist slogan.
Socialist goals
The socialist-oriented goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.
Among the New Party’s stated objectives were “full employment, a shorter work week and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal ‘social wage’ to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth; and like programs to ensure gender equity.”
The New Party stated it also sought “the democratization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets [and] community-controlled alternative financial institutions.”
Many of the New Party’s founding members were Democratic Socialists of America leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA.
Last month, WND reported on a 1996 print advertisement in a local Chicago newspaper that shows Obama was the speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.
WND first reported on the event in 2010.
Obama listed as New Party member
While Obama’s campaign in 2008 denied the then–presidential candidate was ever an actual member of the New Party, print copies of the New Party News, the party’s official newspaper, show Obama posing with New Party leaders, listing him as a New Party member and printing quotes from him as a member.
The party’s spring 1996 newspaper boasted: “New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).”
The paper quoted Obama saying, “These victories prove that small ‘d’ democracy can work.”
The newspaper lists other politicians it endorsed who were not members but specifies Obama as a New Party member.
New Ground, the newsletter of Chicago’s Democratic Socialists of America, reported in its July/August 1996 edition that Obama attended a New Party membership meeting April 11, 1996, in which he expressed his gratitude for the group’s support and “encouraged NPers (New Party members) to join in his task forces on voter education and voter registration.”
With research by Brenda J.

Reagan/Obama? Oh Give Me A Break!

Barack Hussein Obama, as part of his re-election campaign, is trying to compare himself with President Ronald Reagan. Is he serious? Or is this some kind of joke?
 On April 11/12, Obama promoted his so-called "Buffett Rule" tax increase. He said it is like Reagan's 1985 tax proposal.
 I remember Reagan, I'm proud to say I voted for Reagan, and, Obama is no Reagan. After Obama put this country 5 Trillion bucks farther in debt, and after the election, he is going to push for even more debt, he is blaming the Republicans for not helping him bankrupt the country.
 We cannot afford 4 more years of tax increases, increased spending, and increased government riding on our backs. And, the Obama family's worldwide taxpayer paid vacations.
 In Nov. you don't have to be a big fan of Mitt Romney, just vote against Obama-the worst president in American History. Our future depends on it.
 Only a fool would do otherwise.

The Titanic, 100 Years Ago

As I write this, it is April 14/12, and one century ago, the Titanic sank. This is a sad occasion, and the subject of movies. But, I prefer to remember the Heroes who gave their lives so others might live.
 The engineers, boiler room workers, pump operators, electricians, officers, and many unknown people worked to keep the ship afloat as long as they could, saving over 700 lives. And, the heroic radio operator who was still calling for help, minutes before going to his icy grave.
 And, don't forget the men who stayed on the ship, so women and kids could survive on the too few lifeboats. There were some women who refused to leave their husbands side, and died in their arms. That is love.
 I wonder what would happen today? Would there be as many heroes? It seems like it is just every man for himself today. But, in a disaster, people who may not agree in their religions and politics, help each other when needed.
 I have wondered if I were on the Titanic, what would I do? That question is hard to answer without actually being in the situation. Maybe I would be playing with the band. Those guys might play music with the angels when the time comes.
 My wife said she would not leave my side on the ship, and I know that is true. I am a lucky/blessed man. I don't have to be on the Titanic to know that.

Is Obama's Daughter in Mexico For Spring Break?

 Obama's daughter is in Mexico for spring break. And, she is only 13 years old. This was not reported by the Democrat-controlled media until the area she was in had an earthquake.
 Of course those of us who get info from non-Democrat news sources, already knew about this many days ago. However, Obama declared his kids to be off limits, and the news shows have respected that. Unlike when the Democrat-controlled TV shows attacked Sara Palin's daughters, and said things like joking about one of them getting raped by a black basketball player.
 Of course we conservatives already know about the two-faced media.
 The point is, we the people, can not afford the wild sprending spree Obama family. Obama has put this country 5 trillion dollars farther in debt, " Michelle Antionette" has traveled all over the world-many times at our expense, and now their daughter is traveling on her own at our expense.
 She went to Mexico, which is not safe (especially since the Obama bunch exported assault weapons to Mexican drug gangs in the Fast And Furious scandal), with 25 Secret Service agents and 12 of her friends.  Whose brilliant idea was this?
 How much has this spring break cost we taxpayers? And don't you elderly people love how your Social Security and Medicare have been cut back since Obama got elected? You have to give up things so the Obama family, and their friends, have more money to spend.
 Oh well, just vote for him again because your TV tells you to-again.
 Notice how I have not mentioned Obama's daughter's name? I don't attack a professional politician's kids like the Liberal Democrats do. Only anti-American things their parents do.

                                                                       "Conservative Bill"
                                                                         

Paul Krugman, Obama-Worshiper

What Is An Abortionist? From Brian Kemper

This Says It All

I support those who support the Constitution.

Queen Obama On Jay Leno

Queen Obama will be on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno tonight, Jan. 31/12. Leno announced it on his show last night.
 Something stood out as it was announced: the  audience applause was very weak. When Leno announced the other future guests, they got a large response. When he mentioned wild spending Michelle (Michelle Antionette), not so much.
 People are learning.
 It is estimated that she has cost the taxpayers over 10 millions bucks-so far, since her husband got elected with help from the currupt ACORN, the Communist Party USA, and thousands of dead people (who had a little help from the Democratic Party).
 We won't mention the Trillions her husband has cost us.
 Her  spending spree includes vacations in many other foreign countries, like S. Africa, Spain, England, etc. Her friends have gone on these free trips too.
 I will watch the Tonight Show on NBC.com later, and see what kind of worship the peons in the audience give her.
 One thing you can be sure of, they will be warned against booing and name-calling. So much for freedom of expression.

King and Queen Obama

King and Queen Obama have gone back to Washington after their 10 day, 4 million dollar tax payer paid, vacation in Hawaii. And, as a good socialist, the first thing Obama did was to make one of his accomplices the head of another Federal agency he created. All without input from Congress-just whimpering.
 As is her habit, "Michelle Antionette" Obama left for Hawaii 3 days earlier than her husband, which cost the taxpayers 100,000 bucks. She flies all over the world in a luxurious converted military-type cargo plane. Of course she probably feels abused as her husband flies all over with two 757s, and goes on his campaign trail with two imported 1.1 million dollar taxpayer paid campaign buses-like the rock star the Democrat Media calls him.
 I found out that that horrible W. Bush used to go to his ranch the day after Christmas, so the Secret Service agents could celebrate with their families. That was no problem for the Obamas, they left days before Christmas, with not regard for the agents forced to go too.
 More elitism.
 The point is, we can't afford these rich Democrat Elitists. Is case someone hasn't noticed it yet, we are in a recession. And, teetering on the edge of a full blown depression, and maybe a government bankruptcy. I think the voters have brains enough to replace Obama, but I don't know if we can survive the year he has left.
Of course leftists like my old college professor, Doug Parrott (Sheridan, Wy college), will still make excuses for his Messiah and "Michelle Antionette". However, I talked to a Cummunist who is a retired Harvard professor, which is where Obama got some of his socialist ideas, and this man told me he is against Obama now. He said he fell for the "Hope and Change" bull.
 Of course some people are slow learners. I just hope we have a country left when King and Queen Obama leave OUR White House.